From a speech presented by Children of Jewish Holocaust Survivors Los Angeles (www.CJHSLA.org) on 2010-03-22 :

Although MK Danon speaks of a biblical right (morashah or inheritance) and security need for the land he unfortunately omits the argument for the legal, moral and historical rights of Yehudim to eretz Yisroel. He seems conflicted as he goes on to say (during the questioning) that since only 3% of YoSh is "occupied" by Yehudim, it should be administered by Jordan for the "palestinians." That is his "VISION" for the long term! By this logic, Yehudim should not "occupy" Azza as there is only one Yehudi living there (G-d willing). And he does indeed suggest as part of his "vision" that Egypt "administer" Azza too despite its soil having been sewn with the tears and blood of those that love the land that protects them.

His emphasis was that although the US administration speaks of denying Yehudim living in the land of their own name, the Arab states, including Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia speak with IL only about IRAN, IRAN, IRAN! He may be implying that it is as if the talk about "Jewish settlement" by the US is a deflection or distraction of the US's failure to impose sanctions as they said they would, not-to-mention an obsession to prevent Yehudim sovereignty over the land of their own name.

MK Danon spoke of his responsibilities as head of the Knesset Committee for Children's Rights and mentioned the same thing as Aryeh Eldad (who has indicated his highest aspiration is to be the Education Minister) that 57% of the children in IL don't visit Yerushalayim until their late teens. He references Jabotinsky and his idea of an "Iron Wall" representing one's convictions or inspiration for action. Sadly this "Iron Wall" that he speaks of does not prevent him from proposing to disclaim his morashah.